Israeli failure in its aggression on Yemen… profit and loss statement


After nearly nine months of Yemeni operations against Israeli occupation, it finally decided to aggression on Yemen, but its delayed steps have further reinforced its failures beyond its show of force, opening up new fire against its interests and settlements.

Exclusive – Al-Khabar Al-Yemeni:

In November of last year, Yemen officially entered the “Al-Aqsa Flood” line with operations that varied between bombing the occupation cities on the Red Sea, specifically Umm Al-Rashrash (Eilat).

The operations were a form of fraternal and humanitarian support, while the occupation tightened its siege on Gaza and intensified its massacres against civilians. The Yemeni demand back then was very simple: “Stop the aggression and lift the blockade on Gaza in exchange for halting Yemeni operations.” However, the occupation, backed by America, Britain, and several Western countries, arrogantly believed that containing Yemen was easier than swallowing sips of water, so they rushed successively with their fleets to the Red Sea and escalated their aggression on Yemeni cities, only to be met by the latter with a greater escalation that was not limited to the ban on Israeli navigation but also targeting ships associated with the aggression and its allies, even reaching to targeting the aircraft carrier “Eisenhower” and expanding the siege imposed on the occupation to its other side of the Mediterranean.

Over the course of the nine months, the occupation and its allies failed to halt the operations militarily, with their forces admitting nearly 200 attacks counted on their territories, according to Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Galant. As their intensity increased, its allies decided to knock on the back door in search of an agreement laden with privileges to neutralize Yemen from Gaza, and so it was. The response is consistent and does not differ from previous offers, as Sana’a’s position is humanitarian and non-negotiable.

The occupation and its allies in the region and the world found no means to curb the Yemeni attacks, which were strengthened by Yemeni forces’ unity,” and there was no way to stop them. Its military mantle disintegrated, and the waters along the map of Yemen’s naval operations theater submerged its ships, and its waves ravaged the future of its influence and economy, placing those countries on the brink of the abyss. To prevent their allies from suffering from the fires of this new aggression, they assigned the occupation to carry it out. Driven by revenge and stupidity, the occupation decided to lead a fleet of advanced American F-35 aircraft and others equipped with fuel. The result was the targeting of a fuel tank in a port frequented daily by dozens of Western and foreign ships. for about two thousand kilometers. The result was the targeting of a fuel tank in a port frequented daily by dozens of Western and foreign ships.

The occupation did not need all those costs, as a burning matchstick can ignite fires in an area larger than the one caused by about 10 tons of explosives in an area not exceeding a few kilometers. Although it justified the aggression as a response to 200 Yemeni attacks, it will face the weakness of this number in the coming period. Perhaps the port, which had previously been bombed over 7 years of war and siege, was the only gain that the Yemenis fear will be harmed because it is a humanitarian outlet for millions; however, today, the equation has changed. Yemen no longer has anything to lose, and its next strikes may be stronger and last for months, if not years.

The occupation is the only loser from the escalation on Yemen. Just as Yemeni forces submerged their noses in the seas and oceans, the airstrikes will continue to target it one after another until there is no time to count their types or quantities.



Source link